Archive for the ‘Commentary’ Category

Sense and Nonsense on Autism: Beyond Genetics

Wednesday, August 1st, 2007

Sense and Nonsense about Autism: Beyond Genetics
beach “Autism is currently, in our view, the most important and the fastest-evolving disorder in all of medical science and promises to remain so for the foreseeable future.” —-Dr. Jeffrey A. Lieberman, chairman of the department of psychiatry at Columbia University’s school of medicine.

A few months back David Kirby (author of the book “Evidence of Harm”) interviewed Katy Wright about her autistic child Christian, and more specifically the recovery that he was beginning to make with biomedical treatments that have been developed over the years by the MDs and Ph.D.s involved with the organization Defeat Autism Now (DAN). (http://www.autismmedia.org/media15.html)

Katy makes no bones about what she believes happened to her son: “I believe that Christian’s regression and subsequent autism was the result of receiving six vaccines during one office visit at two months of age,” she wrote. “He screamed for twelve hours and had a 104 degree fever nearly the entire time. His vaccines contained thimerosal,” the mercury-based preservative. “It is devastating,” she added, “because so much of this is preventable.” (more…)

A Year-End Reflection

Thursday, January 4th, 2007

An Inconvenient TruthThe film “An Inconvenient Truth” with Al Gore is a chilling example of what can happen when scientific findings clash with political objective and entrenched economic interests. The science can be made to disappear even when it is impeccable and even when unanimity has been achieved within the scientific community itself. We saw the same phenomenon at work when it came to the dangers of smoking cigarettes, and on numerous occasions over the years with various other environmental issues.

The controversy here is not about needing better science to resolve the outstanding ambiguities, contrary to what is claimed. The science will never be good enough for the critics because the findings will not cease to be inconvenient. Al Gore happened to have a ringside seat to Roger Revell’s early measurements of atmospheric CO2, which already raised caution flags back in the late sixties. The evidence has only gotten more solid since. The whole opposition is clearly policy-driven from start to finish. (more…)

Passing Judgment on the Verdict

Friday, December 8th, 2006

beachLos Angeles has been riveted over the last few months by the trial in Santa Monica of an elderly driver who mowed down numerous bystanders at an open-air farmer’s market, killing ten people and wounding nearly 70, many of them seriously. His car traveled over 1000 feet through the market, managing to avoid all encounters with parked vehicles along the way and hitting only people. The driver, George Russell Weller, was at a loss to explain what happened, but laments “his contribution” to the deaths. At the time of the tragedy, he was 86 years old, having first learned to drive in a Model T.

There was controversy around whether there should be a trial at all, that it would be difficult to find such an elderly person morally culpable. Weller himself may have opened the door with his own behavior after the event. Weller did not testify at the trial, so one must resort to his early utterances to police after the incident. He sounded “contrite, bewildered, and uncomprehending.” The defense contended that he had one grand, monumental senior moment in which he hit the gas rather than the brake, and in his panic was unable to correct himself. (more…)

Thoughts on Visiting the Cardiologist

Wednesday, May 24th, 2006

Even a regular visit to a cardiologist is an occasion for a sobering appraisal of one’s lifestyle. It is Judgment Day of a sort, as one’s cumulative neglect of dietary prescriptions, exercise mandates, and stress management regimens come to be exposed in the language of the heart waveform pouring out on the chart paper while one labors on the treadmill. My cardiologist seems to be a kind man. I judge this from his touch, as he does not make eye contact. In his past life, he must have been a mole. We’ve only just met, but already he is “my” cardiologist. Once you are talking openly about your heart, the wall to intimacy has already been breached.

When it comes to cardiology we are in the inner sanctum of our medical edifice. This is what medicine does exceedingly well. We have a whole raft of remedies for what ails the heart system, and the whole enterprise is greased to provide these services efficiently and promptly. Cardiologists themselves must incline toward philosophy, in that they have to sit so close to the edge of life with many of their patients. They are at the same time masters of their myriad skills and yet bystanders to much of what transpires with their patients. Their mastery is more apparent to the outside observer; their inner reality may be closer to a sense of helplessness. I can be impressed with what they can see in an ultra-sound; but that same skill only appears mundane to anyone who has been reading ultrasound scans for twenty years. We sense their power; they are aware of their own boundaries. (more…)

A Critique of NIMH’s Major Study of Anti-Depressant Effectiveness

Wednesday, April 26th, 2006

On March 23rd the Washington Post reported in a front-page article on the findings just released from NIMH’s 35-million dollar “Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression” study. The study results were met with mixed reviews. The url:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/03/22/AR2006032202450.html
The results from this study were published in three articles and discussed in an editorial in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM):

  1. The 1st article appeared in the January 2006 American Journal of Psychiatry (AJP) and focused on the initial response to citalopram (an SSRI) by 2,876 patients presenting with major depression in either a psychiatric clinic or primary care setting.
  2. The 2nd article appeared in last week’s NEJM and focused on the effectiveness of bupropion, sertraline, or venlaffaxine for patients who failed to respond to citalopram.
  3. The 3rd article appeared in last week’s NEJM and focused on medication “augmentation” by adding either bupropion or buspirone to citalopram for those patients who failed to respond to citalopram alone.

(more…)

Science and Religion

Thursday, August 25th, 2005

The recent newsletter on this subject was intended to highlight the impulse within science to present a complete theory, in the face of the ineluctable reality that completeness can never be proved. We are bound by our hypotheses, and to assert that these allow for no reality beyond the hypotheses is to confuse the map with the territory. It has been rigorously shown in mathematics that a set of axioms that forms a mathematical system will imply propositions that are valid, on the one hand, but not provable from those axioms, on the other. Even more so in science, we will never be able to rule out the existence of phenomena that contradict the naturalistic hypothesis.

I was done with this topic but for the appearance of an article on the same subject in the New York Times of August 23. It is really only in the context of a formal discussion on the topic that most scientists will declare themselves on this issue. So it was that at a recent conference at City College of New York, a student asked, “Can you be a good scientist and believe in God?”

Nobel-prize winning chemist Herbert Hauptman immediately said “No!” Belief in the supernatural is not only incompatible with good science, but “this kind of belief is damaging to the well-being of the human race.” Steven Weinberg expressed a similar sentiment on another occasion: “I think one of the great historical contributions of science is to weaken the hold of religion. That’s a good thing.” (more…)

 

Subscribe to Email Newsletter

The EEG Info Newsletter circulates via email at least once a month. A variety of topics related to the Neurofeedback / EEG Biofeedback field are covered in over 200 articles.
* Email
First Name
Last Name
* = Required Field
I hereby allow EEG Info permission to send messages to me via email as means of communication as indicated by my signing up for this email newsletter.