Home > Articles posted by Siegfried Othmer (Page 26)
FEATURE
on Sep 1, 2009

The death of Senator Edward Kennedy prompts a return to the theme of health care, which was his principal cause over his nearly fifty-year public career. The facts regarding health care don’t appear to be of decisive relevance at this crucial moment in the drama of health care legislation. Those facts not in hand are […]

FEATURE
on Aug 29, 2009

We should be grateful, I suppose, that autism is now finally getting attention from the medical community. As late as the 1990’s, parents were still being blamed for the condition by their pediatricians. And until recently the attempts by DAN doctors (Defeat Autism Now) to get at the medical roots of the condition were mocked […]

FEATURE
on Aug 28, 2009

An informal survey taken on a public website dealing with epilepsy has found a notable trend in the prescribing of anti-convulsant medication. Most people being treated for epilepsy have been tried on a significant number of different medications. The survey results are shown in Figure 1. Shown is the percentage of respondents who have taken […]

FEATURE
on Aug 17, 2009

Two events coalesced recently in my mind—the rehabilitation of Michael Vick and the riot at Chino prison in California. The second of these is tied to a third, namely the directive under which the State of California finds itself to reduce its prison population by 43,000 inmates in short order. Michael Vick hails from my […]

FEATURE
on Aug 14, 2009

At a town hall gathering, the elderly gentleman pleads: “I like Medicare. Don’t let the government take it over.” Where, then, does one start the conversation about health care? President Jefferson said that it would take an educated populace to secure democracy. That’s grounds to worry. There’s probably nothing one can say to the ranters […]

FEATURE
on Aug 6, 2009

It goes without saying that mainstream thinking about neurofeedback to date has been mistaken. The original attempts at replication of Kamiya’s work on alpha training for anxiety were misguided in their methodology and in their conclusions. The rejection of Sterman’s and Lubar’s collective body of work was a blunder of the first magnitude. The continued […]